The standards and guidelines that control how students and teachers behave in a classroom and how they learn are known as classroom expectations.
Depending on the setting, topic, and educational level, they can be
It can have a significant impact on the academic performance, motivation, engagement, and well-being of students and teachers. However, there are also many myths and misconceptions about it that can hinder their effectiveness and create problems in the learning environment.
In this article, Free Essay writer will explore 10 common myths about it, contrast them with the facts and reality, and provide some tips and strategies for setting and maintaining realistic and positive outcomes for students.
It should be differentiated according to the needs, abilities, interests, and backgrounds of individual students.
Different students may have different learning styles, preferences, goals, strengths, challenges, and prior knowledge. Therefore, it should be flexible and adaptable to accommodate the diversity of learners and promote equity and inclusion.
Reality: Differentiating can be challenging and time-consuming for teachers, especially in large or heterogeneous classes. They may face difficulties in balancing the needs of individual students with the demands of the curriculum, standards, and assessments.
Teachers on the other hand may also encounter resistance or confusion from students, parents, or administrators who may perceive differentiated expectations as unfair or inconsistent. So,
Fact:
It should be co-created by the teacher and the students.
It is possible to encourage a sense of ownership, responsibility, and accountability among students by allowing them to co-create the expectations for the classroom. Additionally, it can boost students’ interest in learning, motivation, and buy-in.
Building a healthy and respectful classroom culture where students feel respected, heard, and empowered may also be accomplished with the aid of co-creating the rules of the classroom.
Reality: Co-creating can be complex and challenging for teachers and students.
Fact:
It should be dynamic and responsive to the changing needs, circumstances, and goals of the students and teachers.
It should reflect the ongoing learning and growth of the students and teachers. They should also adapt to the different phases, topics, and activities of the curriculum. It should also consider the external factors that may affect the classroom environment, such as school policies, events, issues, or crises.
Reality: Changing classroom expectations can be difficult and risky for teachers and students.
Teachers may face challenges in communicating and implementing the changes. They may also encounter resistance or confusion from students, parents, or administrators who may prefer stability and consistency in the classroom. Also they lose credibility if they change it very frequently or arbitrarily.
Fact:
It should be based on intrinsic motivation and self-regulation.
Intrinsic motivation is the desire to learn and achieve for one’s own sake, rather than for external rewards or punishments.
| Self-regulation is the ability to monitor and control one’s behavior and learning, rather than relying on external rules or authority. Intrinsic motivation and self-regulation can foster a deeper and more lasting engagement, understanding, and retention of the learning material. |
They can also promote a growth mindset, resilience, and autonomy among students.
Reality: Using rewards and punishments can be tempting and convenient for teachers and students. Rewards and punishments can provide immediate and tangible incentives or consequences for behavior and learning.
They can also simplify and standardize classroom management and assessment practices. However, rewards and punishments can also have negative and unintended effects on the classroom environment and outcomes.
Students’ intrinsic motivation and self-control might be affected negatively by rewards and punishments because they become more concerned with the final results rather than the learning process.
Use rewards and punishments sparingly and cautiously.
Also ensure that rewards and punishments are fair, consistent, transparent, and aligned with the learning objectives.
Balance rewards and punishments with other strategies that support intrinsic motivation and self-regulation.
Fact:
Focused Holistic Outcomes
Holistic outcomes are the cognitive, affective, social, and behavioral outcomes that contribute to the overall development and well-being of students and teachers.
Cognitive outcomes are the knowledge, skills, and strategies that students and teachers acquire and apply in their learning. Affective outcomes are the attitudes, emotions, and values that students and teachers develop and express in their learning.
Social outcomes are the relationships, interactions, and collaborations that students and teachers form and sustain in their learning. Behavioral outcomes are the actions, habits, and routines that students and teachers adopt and practice in their learning.
For example, teachers can set and measure it that address not only the academic content and skills, but also the personal and social competencies, such as critical thinking, creativity, communication, collaboration, self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making.
Reality: Focusing on academic outcomes can be appealing and expected for teachers and students.
Academic outcomes are often the primary and official indicators of the quality and effectiveness of education. They are also often the basis for the evaluation and accountability of students and teachers. However, focusing on academic outcomes alone can be limiting and insufficient for the classroom environment and outcomes.
Academic outcomes can overlook or neglect the other aspects of learning that are equally or more important for the success and happiness of students and teachers. It can also create pressure or stress for students and teachers who may feel overwhelmed or inadequate by the high-stakes testing or grading systems.
Fact:
we should communicate continuously throughout the year.
Communicating classroom expectations continuously can help reinforce and remind students and teachers of the norms and rules that govern their behavior and learning.
It can also help clarify and resolve any doubts, questions, or misunderstandings that may arise. It can also help update and inform students and teachers of any changes or modifications that may occur.
Reality: Communicating once at the beginning of the year can be convenient and efficient for teachers and students.
Teachers and students may assume that are clear and understood by everyone after they are introduced and established at the start of the year.
Teachers and students may also prefer to focus on other aspects of teaching and learning that may seem more urgent or important than presentations and assignments. However, communicating it once at the beginning of the year can be ineffective and problematic for the classroom environment and outcomes.
It can fade or change over time as students and teachers forget or ignore them. It can also become ambiguous or inconsistent as students and teachers interpret or apply them differently. So that it can also become irrelevant or outdated as students and teachers encounter new or different situations or challenges.
Fact:
It should be enforced by the teacher and the students.
Enforcement by the teacher and the students can create a shared sense of responsibility and accountability for the behavior and learning in the classroom.
It can also help foster a culture of trust, respect, and support among the students and teachers. It can also help prevent or reduce the occurrence of conflicts, disruptions, or misbehaviors in the classroom.
Reality: Enforcing classroom expectations by the teacher alone can be easy and natural for teachers and students.
Teachers may feel that they have the authority and duty to enforce it as the leaders and managers of the classroom. Students may feel that they have to follow and obey it as learners and members of the classroom.
However, enforcing rules by the teacher alone can be ineffective and detrimental to the classroom environment and outcomes. Teachers alone can create a power imbalance or a dependency relationship between the students and teachers.
Additionally, it could foster a hostile or unfavorable environment or a compliance culture in the classroom. Students who may feel oppressed or under the teacher’s control may become resentful or rebellious as a result.
Fact:
It should be applied flexibly and contextually.
Applying flexibly and contextually can help accommodate and respond to the varying needs, circumstances, and goals of the students and teachers. It can also help promote a sense of fairness, justice, and compassion in the classroom.
It can also help prevent or resolve any conflicts, misunderstandings, or grievances that may arise.
Reality: Applying classroom expectations uniformly and consistently can be appealing and expected for teachers and students. Applying it uniformly and consistently can provide clarity, simplicity, and transparency for behavior and learning in the classroom.
For kids and teachers, it can also bring security, regularity, and consistency. However, applying it consistently and uniformly can be rigid and impractical for the atmosphere and results of the classroom.
The diversity, complexity, and dynamism of the students and teachers may be overlooked or disregarded if it is applied consistently and uniformly. Additionally, it may foster an atmosphere of rigidity, intolerance, or inflexibility in the classroom.
Students or teachers who feel unfairly or harshly treated by their classroom standards may become frustrated or unsatisfied as a result. Teachers should be flexible and sensitive to the context when enforcing.
When implementing their expectations in the classroom, teachers should also provide justification for their choices and actions. Additionally, teachers should ask their pupils for input and feedback when applying
Fact:
It should be aligned with the school expectations and personal expectations.
School expectations are the norms and rules that guide the behavior and learning of students and teachers in the school. Personal expectations are the norms and rules that guide the behavior and learning of students and teachers as individuals.
Aligning properly with school expectations and personal expectations can help create a sense of coherence, harmony, and alignment among the students and teachers. It can also help support and reinforce the behavior and learning of students and teachers across different settings and situations.
It can also help prevent or reduce any conflicts, contradictions, or confusion that may arise from different or inconsistent expectations. For example, teachers can use the school’s vision, mission, values, or policies to inform and shape it.
Teachers can also use their personal beliefs, goals, or styles to inform and shape it periodically.
Reality: Aligning classroom expectations with school expectations and personal expectations can be difficult and complex for teachers and students.
Teachers and students may face challenges finding or creating a balance or a fit among the different types or levels of expectations. Teachers and students may also face conflicts or tensions among the different sources or influences of expectations.
Teachers and students may also face dilemmas or trade-offs among the different outcomes or consequences of expectations. Teachers should be aware and respectful of the school expectations and the personal expectations of themselves and their students.
Fact:
It should be realistic and achievable, but also challenging and aspirational.
Realistic and achievable expectations of class are the norms and rules that are based on the current and attainable level of behavior and learning of students and teachers. Challenging and aspirational are the norms and rules that are based on the desired and potential level of behavior and learning of students and teachers.
Balancing realistic and achievable expectations with challenging and aspirational ones can help create a sense of confidence, competence, and satisfaction among students and teachers.
It can also help create a sense of curiosity, interest, and excitement among students and teachers. It can also help create a sense of growth, improvement, and achievement among students and teachers.
Reality: Balancing realistic and achievable expectations of class with challenging and aspirational ones can be hard and tricky for teachers and students. Teachers and students may face difficulties finding or creating a balance or a fit among the different types or levels of expectations.
Teachers and students may also face conflicts or tensions among the different sources or influences of expectations. Teachers and students may also face dilemmas or trade-offs among the different outcomes or consequences of expectations.
Be aware of and supportive of both their own practical and achievable aims as well as their students’ challenging and ambitious ones.
Interact and communicate with other teachers, administrators, parents, or counselors.
consider and assess their expectations for both the challenging and aspirational classroom standards as well as the realistic and achievable.
Classroom expectations are an essential and influential component of teaching and learning. They can shape the behavior, learning, and outcomes of students and teachers in positive or negative ways.
Therefore, it is important to understand and address the myths and misconceptions that surround it and contrast them with the facts and reality. By doing so, teachers and students can set and maintain realistic and positive goals that enhance and enrich their educational experience and performance.